FloodLAMP Global LAMP Consortium (gLAMP) - Pre-Competitive vs Open Source Approaches Multi-part analysis of the gLAMP consortium's pre-competitive collaboration model compared to an open source approach for pandemic diagnostic testing. Covers the legal framework for open R&D collaboration, argues that market failure evidence supports treating pandemic testing protocols as public goods, proposes a curated portfolio of 5-10 open source testing protocol families, and describes stakeholder roles needed to sustain them. ai file various xprize _AI_gLAMP and XPrize - pre-competitive vs open-source.md various/xprize/_AI_gLAMP and XPrize - pre-competitive vs open-source.md 2026_03_03 Created by Opus 4.6 Max (Claude) during archive preparation. **PARTIALLY HUMAN REVIEWED - MAY CONTAIN ERRORS** Multi-part analysis exploring gLAMP's pre-competitive collaboration framework versus an open source alternative, legal risks of open R&D collaboration, market failure evidence for treating pandemic testing as a public good, and stakeholder requirements for open source testing infrastructure. Key source: NEB Podcast Interview with Chris Mason (2020-08-31). glamp, pre-competitive, open-source, pandemic-testing, public-goods md CC BY 4.0 - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 4123 5385 gfile-url xfile-github-download-url pdf-gdrive-url pdf-github-url github-markdown-url github-markdown-download-url web-pdf-url web-slides-url youtube-url web-url